Search for information about a product,
therapeutic area or event

Media, investors, advocacy organizations and others, please contact us here.

Hero Section Background Image

IgA Nephropathy Patient Baseline Characteristics in the Sparsentan PROTECT Study

Journal article
Published on March 4, 2023

Topics:

Nephrology IgAN
Contributors:
Barratt J, Rovin B, Wong MG et al.
Name of Journal:
Kidney International Reports


View Publication
DOI:
10.1016/j.ekir.2023.02.1086
Share:


The large, interventional, Phase 3 sparsentan PROTECT trial will provide long-term data on sparsentan in IgA nephropathy across a geographically diverse global cohort1


Background

IgA nephropathy is the most common primary glomerulopathy worldwide.1-3 It is a heterogeneous disease that often progresses to kidney failure.1,4

Historically, treatment options have included renin angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).1

RASi have a known nephroprotective effect, and models of kidney disease have demonstrated a therapeutic effect with endothelin type A receptor antagonists.1,5,6 Together these treatments can target two key pathways in IgA nephropathy.1,6

Sparsentan is a non-immunosuppressive, single-molecule Dual Endothelin Angiotensin Receptor Antagonist (DEARA).1,7,8


Aim

The objective of the Phase 3 PROTECT study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of sparsentan compared with the active comparator irbesartan in IgA nephropathy.1 This manuscript describes the baseline characteristics.1


Approach

PROTECT is a large, international, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled Phase 3 trial in IgA nephropathy of sparsentan 400 mg versus irbesartan 300 mg.1 Key eligibility criteria included1:

  • Biopsy-proven primary IgA nephropathy
  • Proteinuria ≥1 g/day
  • Estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) ≥30 ml/min per 1.73 m2
  • Maximum tolerated (stable) dose of ACEi and/or ARB therapy for ≥12 weeks

Baseline characteristics were analyzed, compared between Asian and non-Asian geographic regions, and compared to other IgA nephropathy trials.1


Findings

Baseline characteristics

Randomized and treated patients (N=404) were primarily White (67.3%, 272/404), non-Hispanic (91.1%, 368/404) adult males (69.8%, 282/404) with a median age of 46 years.1

Patients were from Europe (53%), Asia Pacific (27%), and North America (20%).1

Key baseline clinical and laboratory assessments included1:

  • Median time of initial kidney biopsy: 4.0 years before enrollment
  • History of hypertension: 76.5% (309/404) of patients
  • Mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure: 129/82.4 mmHg
  • Median urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR): 1.2 g/g
  • Median urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR): 1.1 g/g

eGFR varied with the largest portion of patients (35.1%, 142/404) having eGFR corresponding to stage 3b chronic kidney disease (CKD).1

Prior to receiving the study treatment, 63.4% (256/404) of patients were receiving the maximum labeled ACEi or ARB dose.1


Key takeaway

Patients enrolled in the sparsentan PROTECT trial were racially diverse and demonstrated varying stages of CKD.1 The sparsentan PROTECT trial identified the treatment effect of sparsentan across a heterogeneous, high-risk, IgA nephropathy population.1





Footnotes

This study was funded by Travere Therapeutics, Inc. Please see the publication for the full list of disclosures.

ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; CKD, chronic kidney disease; DEARA, Dual Endothelin Angiotensin Receptor Antagonist; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; IgA, immunoglobulin A; RAAS, renin angiotensin-aldosterone system; UACR, urine albumin-creatinine ratio; UPCR, urine protein-creatinine ratio.

  1. Barratt J et al. Kidney Int Rep. 2023;8(5):1043-1056.
  2. McGrogan A et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:414-430.
  3. Schena FP, Nistor I. Semin Nephrol. 2018;38:435-442.
  4. Barbour SJ et al. Kidney Int. 2013;84:1017-1024.
  5. Kohan DE. Kidney Int. 2014;86:896-904.
  6. Komers R et al. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2016;310(10):R877-R784.
  7. Kowala MC et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;309:275-284.
  8. Trachtman H et al. Drugs Future. 2020;45:79-98.

MA-SP-24-0056 | February 2026