Search for information about a product,
therapeutic area or event

Media, investors, advocacy organizations and others, please contact us here.

Hero Section Background Image

About FSGS

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a rare, progressive podocytopathy1-3

FSGS is a rare, progressive kidney condition characterized by a shared histologic pattern of podocyte injury and focal glomerular sclerosis, resulting in variable proteinuria and frequently presents with nephrotic syndrome.1-3


FSGS is a rare condition, yet it is one of the leading causes of kidney failure, affecting adults and children4

  • US prevalence of FSGS is 212.6 per 1,000,000*, with ~50,000 adults currently living with progressive kidney disease due to FSGS4
  • Approximately 68% of patients are already at chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage 3 or higher at time of biopsy, meaning many patients have advanced disease progression at diagnosis5
  • Approximately half of patients progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) within 10–20 years of diagnosis6

FSGS disproportionately impacts certain populations2,7

  • ~2x more males are affected than females2
  • 2-3x more prevalent in African American patients versus White patients7

The disease burden extends beyond kidney outcomes and includes nephrotic syndrome complications, cardiovascular risk, and reduced quality of life1,8-10

  • FSGS accounts for nephrotic syndrome in 20% of children and 40% of adults1,11

Introduction to FSGS Introduction to FSGS
Podcast Episode Nephrology FSGS

Introduction to FSGS

Hear Dr. Howard Trachtman discuss FSGS classification, the role of podocyte injury, and the treatment challenges that patients face

Listen now

Classification of FSGS

The 2021 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerular Disease Guideline classifies FSGS by proteinuria, etiology, and histologic presentation 
on biopsy.3

Primary FSGS

Primary FSGS

  • Most common form of FSGS in adolescents and young adults12
  • Thought to be the result of putative circulating permeability factors that cause podocyte injury3,12,13

Diagnostic characteristics3
Genetic FSGS

Genetic FSGS

  • Genetic forms of FSGS arise from genetic variants affecting podocyte biology, the glomerular basement membrane, or related kidney developmental pathways.14 These may present as renal-limited disease, with manifestations confined to the kidneys, or as syndromic disease, with extra-renal manifestations.14

Diagnostic characteristics3 Key associated genes15
Secondary FSGS

Secondary FSGS

  • FSGS lesion found in the setting of an established pathophysiologic process known to cause FSGS3
  • May occur due to adaptive changes associated with an underlying condition, viral infections, or may be drug-induced3

Diagnostic characteristics3
FSGS of undetermined cause

FSGS of undetermined cause

  • Presence of FSGS lesions with no identified underlying etiology of primary, genetic, or secondary FSGS3

Diagnostic characteristics3

Pathophysiology: A shared mechanism of podocyte injury

Although FSGS can arise from diverse causes, all forms share a common glomerular lesion resulting from podocyte injury.1,12

In FSGS, early podocyte stress can promote enhanced endothelin-1 (ET-1) and angiotensin II (Ang II) signaling, activating inflammatory pathways that perpetuate glomerular damage and disease progression.15-18

Within this cycle, Ang II activates ET-1 production in a positive feedback loop, promoting perpetual upregulation and continuous pathway activation.15,17,19
Signaling through the endothelin type A (ETA) and angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptors then propagates further podocyte injury, leading to15,20,21:

  • Podocyte detachment
  • Apoptosis

As podocyte loss accumulates, integrity of the glomerular filtration barrier declines, resulting in worsening proteinuria.15,20,21

Collectively, these mechanisms sustain a self-perpetuating cycle of ongoing podocyte injury, persistent proteinuria, and progressive kidney damage that drives long-term disease progression and poor clinical outcomes.8,16-18,21-25

Early recognition of disease manifestations and prompt diagnosis are essential for implementing strategies to reduce proteinuria and mitigate further kidney injury.3,11,26


From Podocyte to Patient: 
The Pathophysiology of FSGS From Podocyte to Patient: 
The Pathophysiology of FSGS
Podcast Episode Nephrology FSGS

From Podocyte to Patient: The Pathophysiology of FSGS

Listen to Dr. Huber discuss the role of ET-1 and Ang II signaling in FSGS disease progression

Listen now

MA-SP-25-0077 | May 2025


*Estimated annual US prevalence (average for January 2016- December 2020) of FSGS.
Nephrotic syndrome is defined as proteinuria >3.5 g/day plus hypoalbuminemia (<30 g/L) often, but not necessarily, accompanied by dyslipidemia and edema.
Ang II, angiotensin II; AT1, angiotensin type 1 receptor; CKD, chronic kidney disease; ESKD, end-stage kidney disease; ETA, endothelin type A receptor; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; KDIGO, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes.

  1. D’agati VD et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(25):2398-2411.
  2. Shabaka A et al. Nephron. 2020;144(9):413-427.
  3. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerular Diseases Work Group. Kidney Int. 2021;100(4S):S1-S276.
  4. Bensink ME, et al. Am J Manag Care. 2025;10.37765.
  5. Tuttle KR et al. Kidney Med. 2024;6(2):100748.
  6. Cravedi P et al. Am J Transplant. 2013;13(2):266-274.
  7. Korbet SM. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(11):1769-1776.
  8. Velez JCQ et al. Kidney360. 2024;5(8).
  9. Go AS et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32(9):2303-2314.
  10. Szklarzewicz J et al. Quality of Life Research. 2025;34(7):1925-1937.
  11. Rout P, Hashmi MF, Baradhi KM. Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis. [Updated 2024 Dec 11]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532272/. Accessed March 6, 2026.
  12. Rosenberg AZ et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(3):502-517.
  13. Hommos MS et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(12):1772-1781.
  14. De Vriese AS et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29(3):759-774.
  15. Kohan DE et al. Kidney Int. 2014;86(5):896-904.
  16. Komers R et al. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2016;310(10):R877-R884.
  17. Kohan DE et al. Clin Sci (Lond). 2024;138(11):645-662.
  18. Van De Lest NA et al. Kidney Int Rep. 2021;6(7):1939-1948.
  19. Barton M et al. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1997;238(3):861-865.
  20. Jefferson JA et al. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2014;21(5):408-416.
  21. Ebefors K et al. Kidney Int. 2019;96(4):957-970.
  22. Maguire JJ et al. Semin Nephrol. 2015;35(2):125-136.
  23. Nicholas SB et al. BMC Nephrology. 2025;26(1):403.
  24. Goldschmidt D et al. PLOS ONE. 2024;19(12):e0315302.
  25. Kiffel J et al. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2011;18(5):332-338.
  26. Gembillo G et al. World J Nephrol. 2025;14(2):103039.

MA-DS-26-0022 | May 2026